The sheer decadence of terminal liberalism is highlighted by two recent pieces of news out of Britain.
Manchester City Football Club has partnered with Puma in release of a special uniform in support of the LGBT community. The set is timed to coincide with the annual gay pride events that started in Manchester on August 23. The special strip is white with rainbow edging around the emblem of the “City”. The LGBT flag is featured on the back with the inscription “Proud”, highlighted in sky blue. Also the design of the football club t-shirt contains the inscription “Together We Stand”, and the logo of the organisation “Football Against Homophobia.”
The whole thing is of course about making money for the club and for the manufacturers. But it is also seeking to exploit some of the UK’s biggest current sporting idols to normalise homosexuality. While this agenda masquerades as ‘tolerance’, it has its roots in the extreme intolerance of Cultural Marxists towards family values, Christian traditions and births within the indigenous populations of Europe.
But the relentless promotion of the LGBTQ+ agenda is by no means the most abnormal pushing of traditional boundaries in liberal Britain. Alongside ‘normalising’ homosexuality, UK academics are now working on ‘normalising’ cannibalism!
Last year, the University of Warwick hosted a curious conference called “BITES HERE AND THERE”: LITERAL AND METAPHORICAL CANNIBALISM ACROSS DISCIPLINES,” where topics such as “Cannibalism and anthropocentrism: getting to know the other as meat” were discussed seriously. “Identification of the noble and baser cannibalistic motif: typology of risk and necessary,” “Ethical approach to eating: justification of cannibalism in modern literature” and “a kiss as beginning of cannibalism.”
If you think it’s obvious madness – a single madness of a senile individual, it’s not.
Now psychologists from the British Lancaster University have published the results of a study in which the subjects were asked to assess the situation where their friend gave them permission to eat his flesh after his death, and the risks of diseases were excluded. In doing so, they were given a context in which eating the corpse of the deceased is an act of respect and memory.
The authors of the study regret to state that, despite all the explanations and logical calculations, people overwhelmingly consider even ‘ethical cannibalism’ disgusting and absolutely unacceptable. However, the ‘scientists’ express the hope that we will still ‘be able to adapt to eating human meat if the need arises.’”
We note that this apparently insane set of suggestions fit perfectly into the fashionable elite and ‘green’ talk about the ‘need’ to reduce the population of the planet.
But this rate of reducing the population is not enough for them. If they succeed in brainwashing the population that devouring the neighbours is normal, then the struggle to reduce the number of people will go to a whole new level.
Sounds crazy, doesn’t it? But the Overton window is already open and it stinks of cooked human flesh. And don’t say it’s impossible. After all, who in their right mind in Britain just twenty or thirty years ago would have said that by 2019 Manchester City players would be playing in t-shirts propagandising sexual perversions and the chemical and surgical castration of young boys?
